Monday, November 7, 2011

Disgrace

As a reader who has respect for the author’s intentions, I truly felt sad as I read about the action David Lurie did not take at the very end of J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace. Leading up to the end, an affair with a student, being burnt in an attack by intruders, a daughter who was raped but doesn’t want the intruders to be brought to justice, letting unwanted dogs lick his hand, holding the unwanted dogs down as they are being euthanized, and honorably sending the dogs’ bodies through the incinerator, David appeared to be changing. After all that he has been through, I was astonished when David carried the dog, who had grown close to him and howled with the music, into the surgery room to be put to sleep. Bev Shaw asks, “I thought you would save him for another week… Are you giving him up?” In response, David says, “Yes, I am giving him up” (220). David has given up not only on the young dog, but also on himself.

After this small exchange of words, the only question that remains is why did David go through with the euthanasia? Before we can even answer that question, we need to establish the fact that Bev works for the Animal Welfare League and sterilizes and euthanizes because she cares about animals. She helps take care of sick and injured animals. Plus, she also is the only one who will make a dog feel comfortable by putting it to sleep. Although she calls it slaughter, the way Bev accomplishes this terrible fate is by petting, scratching, and talking kindly to the dogs before their disgrace is over and their souls transfer into a graceful world.


There was a time when David had to pull over and cry in his car because he could not get used to the killing of dogs. It seems like David has a newfound respect for Bev’s work because he understands how difficult it is watch a dog walk into a room with its tail wagging and never to walk out again. But then, David wonders if euthanizing a dog is a cruel act or a kind act and whether or not Bev is a “liberating angel or a devil” (144). He even calls himself a “murderer” and lets the dogs lick his hand (143). David’s conflicting feelings about the process of a dog’s disgrace of dying leaves him wanting to honor the corpses but at the same time feeling stupid for being a “dog undertaker.”

Just like the dogs’ corpses burn in the incinerator and his head was burnt by the intruders, David’s meaning of life has dwindled down to ashes. He wants justice in the world. But justice is hard to achieve when all parties are not on board. The unwanted animals, who did nothing wrong, are not brought justice when they are being euthanized. Although they are two completely different situations, just like David’s daughter Lucy did not report her rape, David did not save the dog in the end. Lucy’s rapists are out there in the world living a free life. The dogs, who did not commit a violent act or break a law, are dead. One of Coetzee’s intentions for the novel is to show how rare justice is. David had the total power to save the dog, but he didn’t. I was upset because it was his disgrace or dishonor that an innocent dog died by euthanasia when David gave up. David has given up on finding justice for his daughter, for the dogs, and for himself.

2 comments:

  1. Mallory,

    I think you've chosen a good question to ask here. Why *does* David Lurie put his favorite dog down? What is the significance of that moment? To be honest, I'm not sure I know; the motivations of the characters in this novel are often confusing to me. I am quite ready to agree, though, that Lurie's final action in the novel should be taken negatively. Just before he puts the dog down, Lurie muses over the fact that "what used to be hard as hard can be grows harder yet," and he acknowledges that "He can save the young dog, if he wishes, for another week. But a time must come, it cannot be evaded, when he will have to bring him to Bev Shaw in her operating room" (219). It seems to me that Lurie is, in a way, bravely facing a difficult situation instead of choosing to avoid it by putting it off for another week. The only act of kindness he will be able to provide the dog is to comfort it as it dies, and he does this. The ending I wanted - which I knew Coetzee would never give me - was for Lurie to adopt the poor dog and for the two of them to live together, a bit mangled, but happy. That's the Disney ending, though, isn't it? The reality is that there *are* too many dogs and they can't all be saved. As you say, "Bev works for the Animal Welfare League and sterilizes and euthanizes because she cares about animals," and
    I think the same is true of Lurie here. It is said that he has come to be able to call what he gives the dogs "by its proper name: love" (219). I think that his act of putting aside his own pain and doing what needed to be done for the dog was just that, an act of love.
    I agree with you that there is a connection between the way Lurie treats the dogs and how he views himself; I'm just not sure whether in this final scene he is "giving himself up" or growing as a person. Maybe both are true; I think it is fair to say that there are elements of Lurie's character that there is no place for in his society, just as there is no place for those unwanted, extraneous dogs. What leaves me unsettled at the end of this novel is that I'm not sure of whether I am supposed to sad about the elements of himself that Lurie has sacrificed, or not.

    -Melissa

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oops. That should have read, "I am NOT quite ready to agree." Sorry,

    ReplyDelete